-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Don Devore:
Sorry to interject, but just because a person likes "Alternative" band X, he must also be a fan of "Alternative" bands Y and Z?</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>
apparenly so
-
First statement was a wind up...second based on fact....some of those bands are nowhere near mainstream...and its ridiculous to even suggest that they are.
-
The mainstream's rising - soon it's gonna flood and the levee's gonna break
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by DJ-Ants:
First statement was a wind up...second based on fact....some of those bands are nowhere near mainstream...and its ridiculous to even suggest that they are.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>
like which one?
I think we must be looking at different lists
-
+ is Kerrang a mainstream magazine
